Is this Illinois' Last Chance to keep the Chicago Bears' Stadium Where it should be?
- Bilal Kamal
- Jun 25
- 4 min read
Updated: Jun 29

For much of the past year, the Chicago Bears’ stadium search has been narrowed to one destination: Hammond, Indiana. After years of uncertainty surrounding Arlington Heights and continued disagreements with Illinois lawmakers over public funding, the Bears recently approved plans to explore a massive mixed-use development just across the state line.
Now, another twist has entered the conversation.
Illinois Communities Enter the Conversation
Two Illinois communities, McCook and Waukegan, have officially stepped forward with proposals designed to keep the Bears in their home state. While neither proposal currently appears to be the favorite, both represent another attempt to convince the organization that remaining in Illinois is still the best long-term decision.
The timing is significant.
Only days after Hammond emerged as the frontrunner in the Bears' new stadium discussions, McCook unveiled perhaps the most aggressive stadium proposal the Bears have seen throughout this lengthy process. Village officials have offered approximately 150 acres of former quarry land free of charge, a $1-per-year lease agreement, and a publicly owned stadium that would eliminate property taxes for the franchise.
Those incentives directly address one of ownership's biggest priorities throughout the Bears' stadium search process. Minimizing long-term costs while maximizing surrounding development opportunities.
Location also works in McCook's favor. The site sits near 55th Street and East Avenue, giving fans access to get to the stadium via major highways, while remaining inside Illinois.
For supporters who have voiced concerns about crossing state lines for every home game, that alone could be an attractive selling point.
Still, there are questions.
Unlike Hammond, McCook has not spent months publicly working alongside the Bears. The organization has yet to indicate that the village is under serious consideration, making the proposal feel more like an invitation than an active negotiation.
Waukegan has also renewed its interest in hosting the Bears.
The Lake County city has previously expressed interest in becoming the franchise's future home, and officials once again believe the community deserves consideration.
While Waukegan offers lakefront potential and additional development space, its distance from downtown Chicago could make accessibility more challenging for many fans compared to other options.
Why Hammond Still Holds the Edge in the Bears' Stadium Search
As intriguing as the Illinois proposals may be, Hammond continues to hold the strongest position in the Bears' stadium search.
The Indiana proposal offers something the Bears have been chasing for years: certainty.
Located just southeast of Chicago, the Hammond site would allow the franchise to build a modern enclosed stadium surrounded by entertainment, restaurants, hotels, and retail space. The development could become a year-round destination rather than simply a place to host football games eight or nine times each season.
That vision mirrors what organizations like the Los Angeles Rams accomplished with SoFi Stadium and what the Tennessee Titans are building in Nashville.
Modern NFL stadiums are no longer just venues to play football. They are now expected to hold multiple other types of events, and the next Chicago Bears stadium is expected to follow that same model.
Another advantage for Hammond is momentum.
Indiana officials have moved quickly to present financing options and demonstrate political support. In contrast, the Bears' relationship with Illinois lawmakers has been marked by years of stalled negotiations, changing proposals, and uncertainty over public funding.
From the organization's perspective, that stability matters. Even so, the emergence of McCook and Waukegan changes the conversation.
Their proposals remind everyone that Illinois is not ready to lose one of its most iconic sports franchises without a fight. Whether either location becomes a legitimate contender remains to be seen, but the added competition could increase pressure on both Indiana and Illinois officials to present even stronger offers.
What This Means for the Bears Moving Forward
For Bears fans, the latest developments provide cautious optimism.
Many supporters would prefer the franchise remain in Illinois, preserving its identity while avoiding an out-of-state move. Others simply want the uncertainty to end and for construction on a new stadium to finally begin after years of speculation.
At the moment, Hammond still appears to be the favorites as the stadium site.
However, until the Bears officially announce a final decision, the stadium race remains far from over. If McCook's unprecedented financial incentives or Waukegan's renewed interest can force the organization back to the negotiating table, one more unexpected twist may still be ahead.
Stadium Proposal Comparison
Category | McCook, IL | Waukegan, IL | Hammond, IN |
Current Status | Newly proposed site | Newly renewed proposal | Current frontrunner |
Site Location | 150-acre former quarry at 55th Street & East Avenue | Lakefront site in Waukegan | Northwest Indiana, just southeast of Chicago |
Distance from Downtown Chicago | ~15 miles southwest | ~40–45 miles north | ~20 miles southeast |
Land Offer | 150 acres offered to the Bears | Development land available (details limited) | Large mixed-use development site already under evaluation |
Financial Incentives | Land provided free, $1/year lease, publicly owned stadium eliminating property taxes | No detailed financial package announced | Indiana-backed financing framework and state support already established |
Infrastructure | Access to I-55, I-294, nearby Metra | Lakefront access with regional highways | Close to I-90/I-94 with room for parking and entertainment district |
Political Support | Strong support from village officials | Support from local officials | Strong support from Indiana lawmakers and Hammond officials |
Development Vision | 80,000-seat domed stadium with surrounding development | Stadium and redevelopment opportunity | Full entertainment district with retail, hotels, restaurants, and year-round events |
Advantages | Extremely team-friendly financial package, stays in Illinois, lower operating costs | Keeps Bears in Illinois, lakefront potential | Most advanced proposal, strongest momentum, established partnership with Bears |
Potential Concerns | Proposal is brand new with no confirmed negotiations | Few public details, farther from Chicago | Team would leave Illinois, which remains unpopular with many fans |
Likelihood (Current) | Moderate | Low | High |




Comments